Era selection · Legends Database

The 2000s, selected

A curated squad for the decade: its defining talents, a canonical XI and the tactical structures that fit the available player pool.

206 in pool27 selected4-2-3-1 canonical XI
Canonical XI91XI OVR · not squad avg.
Selection identity

2000s football, in profile

The database associates 206 rated legends with this era. The dossier turns that wider pool into a balanced 27-player selection without hiding the difference between the two samples.

GK913 selected
DEF898 selected
MID908 selected
ATT908 selected
Squad composition

National voices in the era

Italy5 players19%
Brazil4 players15%
Argentina3 players11%
France3 players11%
Netherlands2 players7%
Formation lab

The canonical XI, with real alternatives

Only complete systems can be activated. Changing shape updates the XI rating, positional fit and tactical reading.

XI OVR9191% natural-role fit
Explore all tactical systemsFour families · unavailable shapes remain explained

Classic

Balanced systems users already understand at a glance.

Control

Extra midfield protection, compact blocks and safer structures.

Historical

Older tactical languages rebuilt for all-time squads.

Expressive

Attack-minded, asymmetric and high-risk shapes.

AI-assisted editorial analysis

Tactical Verdict

The 2000s XI feels like football entering the laboratory: faster, more specialised, more Champions League-shaped, and full of players who lived in extremely demanding tactical environments.

The midfield is a luxury department. You can build control, transitions, possession or vertical attacks depending on who starts, which makes the side tactically flexible rather than locked into one mood.

In attack, the generation has enormous variety: scorers, wide forwards, creators between the lines and players comfortable in broken games. It is not just talent; it is talent trained by elite structures.

Defensively, the side has power and experience, though its biggest challenge is choosing how brave to be. Sit too deep and you waste the midfield; push too high and the match becomes a sprint.

Well, this decade is probably less romantic than some earlier ones, but it may be more usable. It has the tools of modern football without losing star quality.

Player signatures

Leaders of this selection

Composite labels use readable averages, never unexplained raw attribute sums.

Show four more player signatures
Physical profile

182 cm average

Known measurements only: 27 of 27 selected players.

168 cm196 cm
2000s27
Selected squadExplore all 27 legendsThe full database table stays one click away without dominating the page.
Selected All-Time 2000s squad. Sortable rating and career columns.
Buffon, GianluigiItaly · JuventusGK93954433176——
Kahn, OliverGermany · Bayern MunichGK9191543386——
Čech, PetrCzech Republic · ChelseaGK88925132124——
Zanetti, JavierArgentina · InternazionaleRB8878787614550.03
MaiconBrazil · InternazionaleRB877179777670.09
Roberto CarlosBrazil · Real MadridLB91718079125110.08
Cole, AshleyEngland · ChelseaLB86767874107——
Márquez, RafaelMexico · BarcelonaSW86848173147190.12
Nesta, AlessandroItaly · MilanCB9192786978——
Cannavaro, FabioItaly · ParmaCB9092717013620.01
Thuram, LilianFrance · JuventusCB9089767014220.01
Gattuso, GennaroItaly · MilanDM878871697310.01
Cambiasso, EstebanArgentina · InternazionaleDM868682795250.09
Zidane, ZinedineFrance · Real MadridAM93579385108310.28
Pirlo, AndreaItaly · MilanCM91709683116130.11
RonaldinhoBrazil · BarcelonaAM9147918397330.34
XaviSpain · BarcelonaCM91699382133130.09
Figo, LuísPortugal · Real MadridRM90569082127320.25
KakáBrazil · MilanAM9053878490290.32
Henry, ThierryFrance · ArsenalST91458791123510.41
Shevchenko, AndriyUkraine · MilanST91518192111480.43
Eto'o, SamuelCameroon · BarcelonaST90527989118560.48
Drogba, DidierIvory Coast · ChelseaST8952758763420.66
Robben, ArjenNetherlands · Bayern MunichRW8947848596370.38
Van Nistelrooy, RuudNetherlands · Manchester UnitedST8947809470350.50
Villa, DavidSpain · ValenciaST8946799298590.60
Crespo, HernánArgentina · ParmaST8842749264350.54
Transparent comparison

Put the complete pools side by side

This comparison uses every rated player matching each selection—not the curated squad and not an AI verdict.

Current2000s206 qualified players · peak 93
VS
Challenger1950s

All composite values are averages on the same 0–100 attribute scale. Pool size remains visible because depth affects interpretation.

Continue the journey

Take the selection beyond the page

Change the XI, simulate a match or move to the adjacent selection.