ST Sheringham, Teddy

Teddy Sheringham

85
Overall?
Born1966
Height183 cm
Weight79 kg
FootRight
926
Club Apps
361
Club Goals
0.39
Club Ratio
51
Nat Apps
11
Nat Goals
0.22
Nat Ratio
Positional Heatmap Illustrative · role & skills data
ST · FW
Playing Style
Guide
Poacher
Also plays
FW
Skill Radar? Weighted by role
ATHTECMENTACDEFATT 798381845786 85 OVERALL
86
Att. Skills?
80
Playmaking?
57
Def. Skills?
Athletic 79
ACC
75
PAC
76
AGI
73
STR
85
BAL
82
JMP
80
STA
81
FIT
80
Technical 83
DRI
81
S-PAS
83
L-PAS
77
FIN
88
SHO-A
83
SHO-P
82
HEA
86
TAC
52
FRK
77
PEN
88
TEC
84
Mental 81
COM
86
AGG
75
CON
77
CREA
76
LDR
76
WRT
84
Tactical 84
VIS
78
OFB
89
DEF
52
TMW
86
ANT
86
MAR
48
england - Striker Sheringham, Teddy
Teddy Sheringham was a centre-forward who played as if he had been given tomorrow’s newspaper before kick-off. He was never quick, never explosive, and absolutely not the striker you sent into space hoping for a sprinting miracle. His genius lived elsewhere: first touch, disguise, timing, layoffs, calm finishing and that extraordinary ability to connect attacks before defenders understood where the danger had moved. At Tottenham he was the elegant reference point, at Manchester United he became the veteran who still knew exactly how to hurt a match, including the 1999 Champions League final, where subtle players apparently also enjoy writing history with a sledgehammer. For England, too, he offered intelligence rather than noise, often making others more dangerous around him. A slow forward only on paper, Sheringham was mentally two steps ahead, and that is usually the step that matters.
See also
Explore more
Three curated routes to keep exploring without losing the thread.
Same era
The 1990s context
See who shared the same decade, tempo and tactical environment.
View path ->
Same club
The Tottenham thread
Follow the club connection and compare different generations of the same shirt.
View path ->
Same profile
Similar striker profiles
A more technical path based on role family and shared player tags.
View path ->
Compare with